Power storage research report epc template

Which energy storage technologies are included in the 2020 cost and performance assessment?

The 2020 Cost and Performance Assessment provided installed costs for six energy storage technologies: lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, lead-acid batteries, vanadium redox flow batteries, pumped storage hydro, compressed-air energy storage, and hydrogen energy storage.

What are the different types of energy storage technologies?

This report covers the following energy storage technologies: lithium-ion batteries, lead–acid batteries, pumped-storage hydropower, compressed-air energy storage, redox flow batteries, hydrogen, building thermal energy storage, and select long-duration energy storage technologies.

What are EPC costs?

EPC encompass the remaining costs for a turnkey project. The main cost segments are installation, project management, engineering, shipping, and commissioning. Variations in EPC costs may arise from specific site conditions or project requirements.

Why is a data-driven assessment of energy storage technologies important?

This data-driven assessment of the current status of energy storage technologies is essential to track progress toward the goals described in the ESGC and inform the decision-making of a broad range of stakeholders.

How are grid applications sized based on power storage capacity?

These other grid applications are sized according to power storage capacity (in MWh): renewable integration, peak shaving and load leveling, and microgrids. BESS = battery energy storage system, h = hour, Hz = hertz, MW = megawatt, MWh = megawatt-hour.

Who controls EPC?

EPC is estimated to be approximately 20% of overall project costs. Fees and overhead make up 7%, contingency is 6%, and the remaining 7% includes profit (Aquino et al., 2017). In this model, EPC is not controlled by the plant owner. In other models, the plant owner takes more control over project execution, with the EPC managing specific contracts.